@Clbull@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 4 months agoLeonardo DiCaprirulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1494arrow-down112
arrow-up1482arrow-down1imageLeonardo DiCaprirulelemmy.world@Clbull@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 4 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-square@gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish12•4 months agoThis person numbers
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)linkfedilinkEnglish4•4 months agoNo. I’ll prove you wrong: 16 26 (16 above 26) Checkmate.
minus-square@niktemadur@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•4 months agoNow that’s the kind of mathematical thinking that leads to shit like imaginary numbers, [∞(∞)/∞-1] or TREE(3), and let’s not forget the Mandelbrot and Julia sets.
16 is under 26
This person numbers
No. I’ll prove you wrong:
16
26
(16 above 26)
Checkmate.
Now that’s the kind of mathematical thinking that leads to shit like imaginary numbers, [∞(∞)/∞-1] or TREE(3), and let’s not forget the Mandelbrot and Julia sets.